New Cost Segregation Guide Released - Covers Costs, Timelines, Qualification

Oct 26, 2026

The Ambrose Group has published a guide to cost segregation studies that explains how the studies work, which properties are strong candidates, what they typically cost and how long they take, and how 100% bonus depreciation affects the timing.

Jersey Village, United States, October 26, 2026 /NewsNetwork/ -- The Ambrose Group, a Texas appraisal, property tax and cost segregation firm, has published a guide to cost segregation studies for commercial and residential rental owners. The guide is available on the company website at https://theambrosegroup.com/cost-segregation-study-guide/.

The guide was written by Daniel Ambrose, MAI, Executive Vice President of Tax Services. It explains how a study works, who should consider one, and when the cost is not worth it.

A cost segregation study breaks a building into its parts. Some of those parts, such as certain finishes, fixtures and site work, can be depreciated over 5, 7 or 15 years instead of the standard 27.5 years for residential rentals or 39 years for commercial buildings. The result is larger deductions in the first years of ownership.

The guide stresses that this is a timing benefit. The deductions are moved earlier, not created. Shorter-lived components can also carry more depreciation recapture when the property is sold.

One step the guide highlights is land allocation. “Land doesn’t depreciate, so what you paid for it has to be separated from what you paid for everything else,” Ambrose writes. The guide says land value should be set with appraisal methods rather than a default percentage.

On who qualifies, the guide gives a working floor of about $500,000 in building basis. Below that level, or for an owner who plans to sell within one or two years, the cost of the study may outweigh the benefit. Owners also need taxable income for the deductions to be useful.

Properties with a large share of finishes and site work tend to benefit most. The guide names medical and dental facilities, restaurants and hotels as examples. Residential and short-term rentals use the same approach on a 27.5-year basis.

The guide also covers buildings bought or built years ago that were never studied. In that case, the owner can file Form 3115 to change accounting methods and claim the missed depreciation as a catch-up adjustment under Section 481(a), without amending old returns.

On cost, the guide cites market figures that run from a few thousand dollars for smaller residential rentals to the low five figures for well-executed commercial studies. A typical study takes about four to eight weeks from kickoff to the final report. Owners can get a first estimate from the free tool at https://theambrosegroup.com/cost-segregation-calculator/ on the company site.

The guide comes as owners continue to plan around 100% bonus depreciation. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill, signed July 4, 2025, made the 100% rate permanent for qualified property acquired after January 19, 2025. In January 2026, the IRS and Treasury issued Notice 2026-11 with interim guidance on the deduction, including how to determine eligibility and the elections available to owners. Building components classified as 5-, 7- or 15-year property can qualify for that deduction.

The guide also explains who should do the work. Citing the IRS audit techniques guide, it says a quality study calls for construction and cost-estimating knowledge along with tax knowledge. In most cases, an engineer identifies and prices the components, a valuation professional handles the land allocation, and the owner’s CPA puts the results on the return. More on the firm’s approach is at https://theambrosegroup.com/cost-segregation-consultants/ on its website.

About The Ambrose Group:

The Ambrose Group is a Texas real estate consulting firm based in Jersey Village that has provided appraisal, property tax consulting and cost segregation services since 1994. The company profile at https://theambrosegroup.com/about-real-estate-company/ covers its history and team.

Contact Info:
Name: The Ambrose Group
Email: Send Email
Organization: The Ambrose Group
Address: 16545 Village Dr Building A, Jersey Village, TX 77040, United States
Website: https://theambrosegroup.com/

Source: NewsNetwork

Release ID: 89207387

If there are any deficiencies, problems, or concerns regarding the information presented in this press release that require attention or if you need assistance with a press release takedown, we encourage you to notify us without delay at [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our diligent team is committed to promptly addressing your concerns within 8 hours and taking necessary actions to rectify any identified issues or facilitate the removal process. Providing accurate and trustworthy information is of utmost importance.

MORE NEWS

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

Oct 26, 2026

Why Democrats are pivoting to thirst traps

“It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it's not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician,” The 19th’s Grace Panetta said on Vox’s Today, Explained podcast. | Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images Democrats have been emphasizing lots of issues in the runup to the 2026 midterms: The Iran war. The state of the economy and healthcare. Corruption. And…hotness. Specifically, their candidates: The internet is awash in clips of Michigan candidate Abdul El-Sayed pumping iron and podcasters proclaiming that “America deserves a hot president” in a video interspersed with photos of Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff. Having a good-looking candidate is by no means a new tactic — famously, it may have helped John F. Kennedy win election over Richard Nixon — but the online left is adapting that strategy for the internet and fandom age.  Grace Panetta, a politics reporter for The 19th, wrote about how “thirst edits” of Ossoff in particular are proliferating online. Panetta says the organic origins of a lot of these videos are of particular interest to Democratic operatives, who see it as a way to gain back ground they lost on the internet after the 2024 election.  Panetta spoke with Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram about who’s thirsting over Democratic politicians in the first place, how 2026’s hot candidates are different from those of yore, and whether it’s actually giving them a boost.  Below is an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Where are these edits coming from? Regular online creators. And it’s important to note at the outset that these are not paid partnerships. The campaign is not paying these influencers to make edits about how they think their candidate’s really attractive.  That’s partly why I wanted to dig into it, because it’s organic. These are just online creators wanting to draw visibility and attention to a candidate that they really like. Jon Ossoff is currently running for reelection in these midterms. How do we know for sure that he isn’t somehow behind the campaign? I spoke to several creators who make these videos and they said that they’re doing it for the love of the game and they’re just supporters. His campaign did not give me a quote or a statement for this story. So it’s fair to assume that he’s not directly involved and he doesn’t repost these videos.  But as people pointed out to me, his campaign knows that they have an attractive, compelling candidate. And they’ve previously been vaunted for their digital strategy this cycle of putting out very high-quality livestreams of his rallies. There’s a lot of material for an enterprising TikToker who wants to make these edits or clips. They have a lot to work with.  His campaign, as one person put it, is definitely playing into that, but not directly engaging. It’s a fine line to walk. Is it just an Ossoff thing or is this going on with other candidates? I do recall that Abdul El-Sayed hits the gym. Famously so. Yes, he hits the gym. I just watched so many videos for this story. I also came across a fair number of Gavin Newsom edits. There are people who think he gives sort of a Patrick Bateman, American Psycho vibe. There are also official Democratic accounts, including the TikTok account for the DNC, the headquarters account, which was formerly Kamala HQ, who have been posting edits of Ossoff and also Abdul El-Sayed, who kind of leans into this gym-bro persona.  The headquarters account posted a side-by-side of Ossoff and Abdul El-Sayed with the caption, “There are 69 days until election day.” Nice. Yes. There are also lots of edits of Mamdani, and former President Barack Obama. Obama nostalgia content goes hard on the internet. So you’re seeing these more official side Democratic campaign accounts leaning into it and playing up their candidates. Having an attractive candidate is nothing new. You mentioned Obama. JFK was famously dashing. What feels different about what you’re seeing now on social media? I think this is really a culmination of a lot of different things happening right now in politics and specifically within the Democratic Party.  After their loss in 2024, there was a lot of conversation about the gerontocracy, how we’re governed by a lot of really old people, for the most part, in this century. And also about Democrats’ digital strategy and the aftermath of 2024.  One thing that a lot of people in that digital space have been talking about is how Republicans and the Trump campaign really capitalized on getting that organic engagement on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where a lot of Americans are now going to get at least some of their news, and also engaging with and encouraging the creation of this kind of organic content on platforms and from creators that are not always expressly political or official-side.  “A candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have.” As one Democrat I talked to put it, she thinks it’s a way for Democrats to win back the internet and to really create a contrast with the Republicans. And she said to have fun on the internet because Republicans are having fun on the internet and it appears to be working for them, or at least it was in 2024. Is there something about this being something on the left that makes it sort of tricky? This is, broadly speaking, objectification, right? It is a fine line between thirst and objectification. And there is also a gendered element to it that it is mostly men that these types of videos are being made about.  Now, granted, a lot of people make sort of hype edits or positive content about AOC because she’s a very popular female politician on the left, but it’s true that women candidates are held to higher standards in terms of how they present themselves and how their supporters portray them.  It is a very real dynamic that you could have all these videos about Jon Ossoff, and it’s not seen as detracting away from his overall message or his seriousness as a politician. Is there a drawback of focusing on looks? Does it make the Democratic Party or these candidates seem superficial or not that serious? President Trump has been the defining figure in our politics for 10 years now. And he is famously very, very image focused and image obsessed. We live in a very image-obsessed society, and I think there’s kind of a bipartisan acknowledgement of that.  And looks matter to people in all kinds of ways. They do matter in politics, they do matter to voters. Whether you like that that’s the case or not, it is the reality. And I think the way that a lot of people on the left see this is, people want to look at attractive people. People take attractive people more seriously and are more willing to listen to them. So we should play into that and play that up.  That’s also been the case on the right. President Trump famously loves people out of “central casting.” There’s been this whole movement on the right about making conservatism sexy again. And especially at the beginning of the second Trump term, you had all these influencers talking about how the second Trump term was going to usher in this great age of hotness, which is of course very based on sort of stereotypical male-centered Eurocentric beauty standards.  I think the genie’s out of the bottle on this one in terms of the fact that our politics and society is very image-obsessed. And I think the left, being locked out of power, realizes they have to play on those terms and they have fun doing it. You could look at it as giving “Kamala is brat,” which famously did not work. Is it working in any tangible way for Ossoff, for Abdul El-Sayed, or anyone else? I think a lot of the time in politics, the success of a message is really dependent on the broader political situation. I think a part of the reason that the Kamala’s brat thing didn’t work is people were like, “Okay, that’s great, but my gas is too expensive and prices are too high and I’m not happy with how things have gone under the Biden administration, so I don’t really care.” I don’t know that specific digital strategy makes or breaks a campaign or candidate, but it feeds into a bunch of larger factors.  Something that a lot of people I spoke to said they liked about Jon Ossoff is how he is incredibly serious in Senate hearings. He doesn’t grandstand. He really holds Trump administration officials’ feet to the fire. He’s been very focused in his role in the Senate and on the campaign trail about calling out corruption. He’s a very, very gifted speaker and orator. So I think a candidate’s messaging strategy is only as good as the content and only if it meets people where they are and actually speaks to a real need people have. And I think people are really unhappy with the second Trump term and politicians being super old and out of touch, and it’s a perfect storm of factors that makes it work for him.

YOUR NEWS, OUR NETWORK.

Do you have Great News you want to tell the world?

Be it updates about your business or your community, you can make sure that it’s heard by submitting your story to our network reaching hundreds of news sites across 6 verticals.

ABOUT US
Logo

We believe that information is the new age currency. Digital Press Network is your source for digital culture and innovation for the connected generation.

SUBSCRIBE
Copyright © 2015 - 2026 Digital Press Network. All Rights Reserved.